Armand Reig Piñol vs Michel Ruimy
NATT/6, 2008 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Armand Reig Piñol vs Michel Ruimy with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Armand Reig Piñol (2360)
- Black
- Michel Ruimy (1843)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- NATT/6
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Armand Reig Piñol (2360) and Michel Ruimy (1843) was played at NATT/6 in 2008 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Armand Reig Piñol games or Michel Ruimy games? This Armand Reig Piñol vs Michel Ruimy encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Armand Reig Piñol vs Michel Ruimy?
Armand Reig Piñol vs Michel Ruimy (2008) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Armand Reig Piñol vs Michel Ruimy?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (ECO B85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Armand Reig Piñol vs Michel Ruimy, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.