Stefan Reich vs Winfried Koebele
Baden opA, 2001 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (A22).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Stefan Reich vs Winfried Koebele with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Stefan Reich
- Black
- Winfried Koebele (1753)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Baden opA
- Year
- 2001
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (A22)
About this chess game
This chess game between Stefan Reich and Winfried Koebele (1753) was played at Baden opA in 2001 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (A22). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Stefan Reich games or Winfried Koebele games? This Stefan Reich vs Winfried Koebele encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Stefan Reich vs Winfried Koebele?
Stefan Reich vs Winfried Koebele (2001) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Stefan Reich vs Winfried Koebele?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (ECO A22).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Stefan Reich vs Winfried Koebele, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.