Jack Regan vs Mark Kastor
Winter TNM, 2006 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation, Flohr Line (D62).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jack Regan vs Mark Kastor with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jack Regan (1564)
- Black
- Mark Kastor (2344)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Winter TNM
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation, Flohr Line (D62)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jack Regan (1564) and Mark Kastor (2344) was played at Winter TNM in 2006 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation, Flohr Line (D62). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jack Regan games or Mark Kastor games? This Jack Regan vs Mark Kastor encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation, Flohr Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jack Regan vs Mark Kastor?
Jack Regan vs Mark Kastor (2006) finished 1–0, a win for Jack Regan.
What opening was played in Jack Regan vs Mark Kastor?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation, Flohr Line (ECO D62).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jack Regan vs Mark Kastor, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.