Bin-Sattar Reefat vs Charles Van Buskirk
Continental Open, 2000 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack, Main Line (B89).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Bin-Sattar Reefat vs Charles Van Buskirk with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Bin-Sattar Reefat (2467)
- Black
- Charles Van Buskirk (2307)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Continental Open
- Year
- 2000
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack, Main Line (B89)
About this chess game
This chess game between Bin-Sattar Reefat (2467) and Charles Van Buskirk (2307) was played at Continental Open in 2000 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack, Main Line (B89). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Bin-Sattar Reefat games or Charles Van Buskirk games? This Bin-Sattar Reefat vs Charles Van Buskirk encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Bin-Sattar Reefat vs Charles Van Buskirk?
Bin-Sattar Reefat vs Charles Van Buskirk (2000) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Bin-Sattar Reefat vs Charles Van Buskirk?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack, Main Line (ECO B89).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Bin-Sattar Reefat vs Charles Van Buskirk, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.