Francis Rayner vs Advik Saxena
Hastings International Chess Congress 2025: Masters, 2025 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (A18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Francis Rayner vs Advik Saxena with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Francis Rayner (1983)
- Black
- Advik Saxena (1806)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Hastings International Chess Congress 2025: Masters
- Year
- 2025
- Opening
- English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (A18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Francis Rayner (1983) and Advik Saxena (1806) was played at Hastings International Chess Congress 2025: Masters in 2025 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (A18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Francis Rayner games or Advik Saxena games? This Francis Rayner vs Advik Saxena encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Francis Rayner vs Advik Saxena?
Francis Rayner vs Advik Saxena (2025) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Francis Rayner vs Advik Saxena?
The game opened with the English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (ECO A18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Francis Rayner vs Advik Saxena, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.