Evelina Ravlusevic vs Ramitha S Ravishankar
2014 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Evelina Ravlusevic vs Ramitha S Ravishankar with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Evelina Ravlusevic (1399)
- Black
- Ramitha S Ravishankar (1568)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Evelina Ravlusevic (1399) and Ramitha S Ravishankar (1568) was played in 2014 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Evelina Ravlusevic games or Ramitha S Ravishankar games? This Evelina Ravlusevic vs Ramitha S Ravishankar encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Evelina Ravlusevic vs Ramitha S Ravishankar?
Evelina Ravlusevic vs Ramitha S Ravishankar (2014) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Evelina Ravlusevic vs Ramitha S Ravishankar?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (ECO D37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Evelina Ravlusevic vs Ramitha S Ravishankar, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.