Joanne Rattan-Chung vs Guliskhan Nakhbayeva
39. Olympiad women, 2010 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Classical Variation (C11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Joanne Rattan-Chung vs Guliskhan Nakhbayeva with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Joanne Rattan-Chung
- Black
- Guliskhan Nakhbayeva (2243)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 39. Olympiad women
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- French Defense: Classical Variation (C11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Joanne Rattan-Chung and Guliskhan Nakhbayeva (2243) was played at 39. Olympiad women in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Classical Variation (C11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Joanne Rattan-Chung games or Guliskhan Nakhbayeva games? This Joanne Rattan-Chung vs Guliskhan Nakhbayeva encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Joanne Rattan-Chung vs Guliskhan Nakhbayeva?
Joanne Rattan-Chung vs Guliskhan Nakhbayeva (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Guliskhan Nakhbayeva.
What opening was played in Joanne Rattan-Chung vs Guliskhan Nakhbayeva?
The game opened with the French Defense: Classical Variation (ECO C11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Joanne Rattan-Chung vs Guliskhan Nakhbayeva, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.