Sandor Rasztik vs Istvan Jankovics
Zalakaros Open 15th, date unknown · Result 1–0 · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Spassky Variation (D88).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sandor Rasztik vs Istvan Jankovics with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sandor Rasztik (2058)
- Black
- Istvan Jankovics (2060)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Zalakaros Open 15th
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Spassky Variation (D88)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sandor Rasztik (2058) and Istvan Jankovics (2060) was played at Zalakaros Open 15th and finished 1–0. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Spassky Variation (D88). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sandor Rasztik games or Istvan Jankovics games? This Sandor Rasztik vs Istvan Jankovics encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Spassky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sandor Rasztik vs Istvan Jankovics?
Sandor Rasztik vs Istvan Jankovics finished 1–0, a win for Sandor Rasztik.
What opening was played in Sandor Rasztik vs Istvan Jankovics?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Spassky Variation (ECO D88).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sandor Rasztik vs Istvan Jankovics, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.