Henrik Egede Rasmussen vs Ray Byrne
27. ECC, 2011 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense (E59).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Henrik Egede Rasmussen vs Ray Byrne with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Henrik Egede Rasmussen (1933)
- Black
- Ray Byrne (2054)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 27. ECC
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense (E59)
About this chess game
This chess game between Henrik Egede Rasmussen (1933) and Ray Byrne (2054) was played at 27. ECC in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense (E59). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Henrik Egede Rasmussen games or Ray Byrne games? This Henrik Egede Rasmussen vs Ray Byrne encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Henrik Egede Rasmussen vs Ray Byrne?
Henrik Egede Rasmussen vs Ray Byrne (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Ray Byrne.
What opening was played in Henrik Egede Rasmussen vs Ray Byrne?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense (ECO E59).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Henrik Egede Rasmussen vs Ray Byrne, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.