Daniel Rangel vs Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva
2017 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Daniel Rangel vs Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Daniel Rangel (2295)
- Black
- Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva (1867)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Daniel Rangel (2295) and Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva (1867) was played in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Daniel Rangel games or Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva games? This Daniel Rangel vs Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Daniel Rangel vs Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva?
Daniel Rangel vs Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Daniel Rangel.
What opening was played in Daniel Rangel vs Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (ECO E67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Daniel Rangel vs Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.