Jim E Ramsden vs Janusz Kusnierz
VWC3/pr17, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jim E Ramsden vs Janusz Kusnierz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jim E Ramsden (1768)
- Black
- Janusz Kusnierz (1897)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- VWC3/pr17
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jim E Ramsden (1768) and Janusz Kusnierz (1897) was played at VWC3/pr17 in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jim E Ramsden games or Janusz Kusnierz games? This Jim E Ramsden vs Janusz Kusnierz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jim E Ramsden vs Janusz Kusnierz?
Jim E Ramsden vs Janusz Kusnierz (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Jim E Ramsden.
What opening was played in Jim E Ramsden vs Janusz Kusnierz?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (ECO B85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jim E Ramsden vs Janusz Kusnierz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.