Carlo Rampini vs Vincenzo Cannada Bartoli
2009 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C17).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Carlo Rampini vs Vincenzo Cannada Bartoli with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Carlo Rampini (1817)
- Black
- Vincenzo Cannada Bartoli (1981)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C17)
About this chess game
This chess game between Carlo Rampini (1817) and Vincenzo Cannada Bartoli (1981) was played in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C17). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Carlo Rampini games or Vincenzo Cannada Bartoli games? This Carlo Rampini vs Vincenzo Cannada Bartoli encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Carlo Rampini vs Vincenzo Cannada Bartoli?
Carlo Rampini vs Vincenzo Cannada Bartoli (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Carlo Rampini vs Vincenzo Cannada Bartoli?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C17).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Carlo Rampini vs Vincenzo Cannada Bartoli, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.