Luis Alejandro Ramos Castro vs Eduardo Velasquez
2012 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation (B53).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luis Alejandro Ramos Castro vs Eduardo Velasquez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luis Alejandro Ramos Castro (1596)
- Black
- Eduardo Velasquez (1930)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation (B53)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luis Alejandro Ramos Castro (1596) and Eduardo Velasquez (1930) was played in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation (B53). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luis Alejandro Ramos Castro games or Eduardo Velasquez games? This Luis Alejandro Ramos Castro vs Eduardo Velasquez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luis Alejandro Ramos Castro vs Eduardo Velasquez?
Luis Alejandro Ramos Castro vs Eduardo Velasquez (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Eduardo Velasquez.
What opening was played in Luis Alejandro Ramos Castro vs Eduardo Velasquez?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation (ECO B53).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luis Alejandro Ramos Castro vs Eduardo Velasquez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.