Carlos Ramirez vs Nolberto Carvajal
Santa Rosa COL, Ch Semifinal (m), 2011 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Carlos Ramirez vs Nolberto Carvajal with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Carlos Ramirez (1769)
- Black
- Nolberto Carvajal (2310)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Santa Rosa COL, Ch Semifinal (m)
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Carlos Ramirez (1769) and Nolberto Carvajal (2310) was played at Santa Rosa COL, Ch Semifinal (m) in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Carlos Ramirez games or Nolberto Carvajal games? This Carlos Ramirez vs Nolberto Carvajal encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Carlos Ramirez vs Nolberto Carvajal?
Carlos Ramirez vs Nolberto Carvajal (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Carlos Ramirez.
What opening was played in Carlos Ramirez vs Nolberto Carvajal?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (ECO E92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Carlos Ramirez vs Nolberto Carvajal, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.