Eduardo Ramirez Allo vs Francisco Alvarado Ascanio
2015 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Eduardo Ramirez Allo vs Francisco Alvarado Ascanio with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Eduardo Ramirez Allo (2274)
- Black
- Francisco Alvarado Ascanio (2189)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01)
About this chess game
This chess game between Eduardo Ramirez Allo (2274) and Francisco Alvarado Ascanio (2189) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Eduardo Ramirez Allo games or Francisco Alvarado Ascanio games? This Eduardo Ramirez Allo vs Francisco Alvarado Ascanio encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Eduardo Ramirez Allo vs Francisco Alvarado Ascanio?
Eduardo Ramirez Allo vs Francisco Alvarado Ascanio (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Eduardo Ramirez Allo vs Francisco Alvarado Ascanio?
The game opened with the French Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO C01).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Eduardo Ramirez Allo vs Francisco Alvarado Ascanio, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.