Quinten Ramacker vs Simon Van Poucke
BEL Ch Open 2013, 2013 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Quinten Ramacker vs Simon Van Poucke with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Quinten Ramacker (1833)
- Black
- Simon Van Poucke (2013)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- BEL Ch Open 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Quinten Ramacker (1833) and Simon Van Poucke (2013) was played at BEL Ch Open 2013 in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Quinten Ramacker games or Simon Van Poucke games? This Quinten Ramacker vs Simon Van Poucke encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Quinten Ramacker vs Simon Van Poucke?
Quinten Ramacker vs Simon Van Poucke (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Quinten Ramacker vs Simon Van Poucke?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (ECO B43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Quinten Ramacker vs Simon Van Poucke, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.