Marcos Raluy Lopez vs Jose Juan Martinez Molina
2017 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marcos Raluy Lopez vs Jose Juan Martinez Molina with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marcos Raluy Lopez (1933)
- Black
- Jose Juan Martinez Molina (1747)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marcos Raluy Lopez (1933) and Jose Juan Martinez Molina (1747) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marcos Raluy Lopez games or Jose Juan Martinez Molina games? This Marcos Raluy Lopez vs Jose Juan Martinez Molina encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marcos Raluy Lopez vs Jose Juan Martinez Molina?
Marcos Raluy Lopez vs Jose Juan Martinez Molina (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Marcos Raluy Lopez vs Jose Juan Martinez Molina?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (ECO E76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marcos Raluy Lopez vs Jose Juan Martinez Molina, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.