Aleksandr Rakhmanov vs Evgeny Alekseev
TCh-RUS Rapid 2016, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense (E48).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Aleksandr Rakhmanov vs Evgeny Alekseev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Aleksandr Rakhmanov (2662)
- Black
- Evgeny Alekseev (2636)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- TCh-RUS Rapid 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense (E48)
About this chess game
This chess game between Aleksandr Rakhmanov (2662) and Evgeny Alekseev (2636) was played at TCh-RUS Rapid 2016 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense (E48). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Aleksandr Rakhmanov games or Evgeny Alekseev games? This Aleksandr Rakhmanov vs Evgeny Alekseev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Aleksandr Rakhmanov vs Evgeny Alekseev?
Aleksandr Rakhmanov vs Evgeny Alekseev (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Aleksandr Rakhmanov.
What opening was played in Aleksandr Rakhmanov vs Evgeny Alekseev?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense (ECO E48).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Aleksandr Rakhmanov vs Evgeny Alekseev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.