Kumar Jena Rakesh vs Braulio David Jaramillo Arce
2011 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B98).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Kumar Jena Rakesh vs Braulio David Jaramillo Arce with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Kumar Jena Rakesh (1865)
- Black
- Braulio David Jaramillo Arce (1452)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B98)
About this chess game
This chess game between Kumar Jena Rakesh (1865) and Braulio David Jaramillo Arce (1452) was played in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B98). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Kumar Jena Rakesh games or Braulio David Jaramillo Arce games? This Kumar Jena Rakesh vs Braulio David Jaramillo Arce encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Kumar Jena Rakesh vs Braulio David Jaramillo Arce?
Kumar Jena Rakesh vs Braulio David Jaramillo Arce (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Kumar Jena Rakesh.
What opening was played in Kumar Jena Rakesh vs Braulio David Jaramillo Arce?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (ECO B98).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Kumar Jena Rakesh vs Braulio David Jaramillo Arce, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.