Dusan Rajkovic vs Vlado Jakovljevic
TCh-MNE Premier League, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System (D18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Dusan Rajkovic vs Vlado Jakovljevic with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Dusan Rajkovic (2453)
- Black
- Vlado Jakovljevic (2383)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- TCh-MNE Premier League
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System (D18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Dusan Rajkovic (2453) and Vlado Jakovljevic (2383) was played at TCh-MNE Premier League in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System (D18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Dusan Rajkovic games or Vlado Jakovljevic games? This Dusan Rajkovic vs Vlado Jakovljevic encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Dusan Rajkovic vs Vlado Jakovljevic?
Dusan Rajkovic vs Vlado Jakovljevic (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Dusan Rajkovic.
What opening was played in Dusan Rajkovic vs Vlado Jakovljevic?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System (ECO D18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Dusan Rajkovic vs Vlado Jakovljevic, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.