Dusan Rajkovic vs Slavisa Brenjo
TCh-SRB 1. League, 2010 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Dusan Rajkovic vs Slavisa Brenjo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Dusan Rajkovic (2453)
- Black
- Slavisa Brenjo (2522)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- TCh-SRB 1. League
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Dusan Rajkovic (2453) and Slavisa Brenjo (2522) was played at TCh-SRB 1. League in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Dusan Rajkovic games or Slavisa Brenjo games? This Dusan Rajkovic vs Slavisa Brenjo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Dusan Rajkovic vs Slavisa Brenjo?
Dusan Rajkovic vs Slavisa Brenjo (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Slavisa Brenjo.
What opening was played in Dusan Rajkovic vs Slavisa Brenjo?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (ECO E81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Dusan Rajkovic vs Slavisa Brenjo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.