Steffen Raetzke von Stoyentin vs Tobias Falk
2013 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch Defense (D40).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Steffen Raetzke von Stoyentin vs Tobias Falk with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Steffen Raetzke von Stoyentin (1754)
- Black
- Tobias Falk (2002)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch Defense (D40)
About this chess game
This chess game between Steffen Raetzke von Stoyentin (1754) and Tobias Falk (2002) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch Defense (D40). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Steffen Raetzke von Stoyentin games or Tobias Falk games? This Steffen Raetzke von Stoyentin vs Tobias Falk encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Steffen Raetzke von Stoyentin vs Tobias Falk?
Steffen Raetzke von Stoyentin vs Tobias Falk (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Steffen Raetzke von Stoyentin vs Tobias Falk?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch Defense (ECO D40).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Steffen Raetzke von Stoyentin vs Tobias Falk, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.