Antoni Radzimski vs Adam Wites
Mistrzostwa Polski Juniorów w Szachach Szybkich | C12, 2024 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation (E46).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Antoni Radzimski vs Adam Wites with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Antoni Radzimski (2062)
- Black
- Adam Wites (1793)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Mistrzostwa Polski Juniorów w Szachach Szybkich | C12
- Year
- 2024
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation (E46)
About this chess game
This chess game between Antoni Radzimski (2062) and Adam Wites (1793) was played at Mistrzostwa Polski Juniorów w Szachach Szybkich | C12 in 2024 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation (E46). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Antoni Radzimski games or Adam Wites games? This Antoni Radzimski vs Adam Wites encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Antoni Radzimski vs Adam Wites?
Antoni Radzimski vs Adam Wites (2024) finished 1–0, a win for Antoni Radzimski.
What opening was played in Antoni Radzimski vs Adam Wites?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation (ECO E46).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Antoni Radzimski vs Adam Wites, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.