Danko Radovanovic vs Nebojsa Klcesko
2013 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Danko Radovanovic vs Nebojsa Klcesko with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Danko Radovanovic (1892)
- Black
- Nebojsa Klcesko (1983)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Danko Radovanovic (1892) and Nebojsa Klcesko (1983) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Danko Radovanovic games or Nebojsa Klcesko games? This Danko Radovanovic vs Nebojsa Klcesko encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Danko Radovanovic vs Nebojsa Klcesko?
Danko Radovanovic vs Nebojsa Klcesko (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Danko Radovanovic vs Nebojsa Klcesko?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (ECO A35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Danko Radovanovic vs Nebojsa Klcesko, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.