Nikola Radovanovic vs Uros Cvetanovic
Zajecar SER, 2. League Est, 2013 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nikola Radovanovic vs Uros Cvetanovic with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nikola Radovanovic (2295)
- Black
- Uros Cvetanovic (2285)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Zajecar SER, 2. League Est
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nikola Radovanovic (2295) and Uros Cvetanovic (2285) was played at Zajecar SER, 2. League Est in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nikola Radovanovic games or Uros Cvetanovic games? This Nikola Radovanovic vs Uros Cvetanovic encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nikola Radovanovic vs Uros Cvetanovic?
Nikola Radovanovic vs Uros Cvetanovic (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Nikola Radovanovic vs Uros Cvetanovic?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (ECO E32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nikola Radovanovic vs Uros Cvetanovic, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.