Lazar Radmanovic vs Edmond Paljusaj
Kastav 7th, 2004 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lazar Radmanovic vs Edmond Paljusaj with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lazar Radmanovic (1916)
- Black
- Edmond Paljusaj (2216)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Kastav 7th
- Year
- 2004
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lazar Radmanovic (1916) and Edmond Paljusaj (2216) was played at Kastav 7th in 2004 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lazar Radmanovic games or Edmond Paljusaj games? This Lazar Radmanovic vs Edmond Paljusaj encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lazar Radmanovic vs Edmond Paljusaj?
Lazar Radmanovic vs Edmond Paljusaj (2004) finished 0–1, a win for Edmond Paljusaj.
What opening was played in Lazar Radmanovic vs Edmond Paljusaj?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (ECO E90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lazar Radmanovic vs Edmond Paljusaj, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.