Chamss-Eddine Rabhi vs Fabrice Cleran
FRA-chT3 Gr5 0203, 2002 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Chamss-Eddine Rabhi vs Fabrice Cleran with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Chamss-Eddine Rabhi (2090)
- Black
- Fabrice Cleran (2017)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- FRA-chT3 Gr5 0203
- Year
- 2002
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Chamss-Eddine Rabhi (2090) and Fabrice Cleran (2017) was played at FRA-chT3 Gr5 0203 in 2002 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Chamss-Eddine Rabhi games or Fabrice Cleran games? This Chamss-Eddine Rabhi vs Fabrice Cleran encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Chamss-Eddine Rabhi vs Fabrice Cleran?
Chamss-Eddine Rabhi vs Fabrice Cleran (2002) finished 1–0, a win for Chamss-Eddine Rabhi.
What opening was played in Chamss-Eddine Rabhi vs Fabrice Cleran?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (ECO E21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Chamss-Eddine Rabhi vs Fabrice Cleran, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.