Mike Rabbitt vs Dan M Lambourne
4NCL Division 2d, 2015 · Result ½–½ · Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mike Rabbitt vs Dan M Lambourne with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mike Rabbitt (2029)
- Black
- Dan M Lambourne (2008)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 4NCL Division 2d
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mike Rabbitt (2029) and Dan M Lambourne (2008) was played at 4NCL Division 2d in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mike Rabbitt games or Dan M Lambourne games? This Mike Rabbitt vs Dan M Lambourne encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mike Rabbitt vs Dan M Lambourne?
Mike Rabbitt vs Dan M Lambourne (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Mike Rabbitt vs Dan M Lambourne?
The game opened with the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (ECO D78).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mike Rabbitt vs Dan M Lambourne, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.