Jacques Rabascall vs Yann Doornbos
Parthenay Open, 1992 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jacques Rabascall vs Yann Doornbos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jacques Rabascall (2093)
- Black
- Yann Doornbos (2245)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Parthenay Open
- Year
- 1992
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jacques Rabascall (2093) and Yann Doornbos (2245) was played at Parthenay Open in 1992 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jacques Rabascall games or Yann Doornbos games? This Jacques Rabascall vs Yann Doornbos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jacques Rabascall vs Yann Doornbos?
Jacques Rabascall vs Yann Doornbos (1992) finished 0–1, a win for Yann Doornbos.
What opening was played in Jacques Rabascall vs Yann Doornbos?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (ECO E90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jacques Rabascall vs Yann Doornbos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.