Massimo Quizielvu vs Oscar Stocchi
ITA/CIN/14 (ITA), 2014 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Massimo Quizielvu vs Oscar Stocchi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Massimo Quizielvu (1956)
- Black
- Oscar Stocchi (1804)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- ITA/CIN/14 (ITA)
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Massimo Quizielvu (1956) and Oscar Stocchi (1804) was played at ITA/CIN/14 (ITA) in 2014 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Massimo Quizielvu games or Oscar Stocchi games? This Massimo Quizielvu vs Oscar Stocchi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Massimo Quizielvu vs Oscar Stocchi?
Massimo Quizielvu vs Oscar Stocchi (2014) finished 1–0, a win for Massimo Quizielvu.
What opening was played in Massimo Quizielvu vs Oscar Stocchi?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Massimo Quizielvu vs Oscar Stocchi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.