Gaetano Quattrocchi vs Marco Giordani
ITA/WQF/002 (ITA), 2008 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gaetano Quattrocchi vs Marco Giordani with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gaetano Quattrocchi (2278)
- Black
- Marco Giordani (2137)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- ITA/WQF/002 (ITA)
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gaetano Quattrocchi (2278) and Marco Giordani (2137) was played at ITA/WQF/002 (ITA) in 2008 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gaetano Quattrocchi games or Marco Giordani games? This Gaetano Quattrocchi vs Marco Giordani encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gaetano Quattrocchi vs Marco Giordani?
Gaetano Quattrocchi vs Marco Giordani (2008) finished 1–0, a win for Gaetano Quattrocchi.
What opening was played in Gaetano Quattrocchi vs Marco Giordani?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (ECO B52).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gaetano Quattrocchi vs Marco Giordani, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.