Frans van Putten vs Stephen V Woodhouse
WS/O/813, 2015 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (C07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Frans van Putten vs Stephen V Woodhouse with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Frans van Putten (1870)
- Black
- Stephen V Woodhouse (1878)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- WS/O/813
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (C07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Frans van Putten (1870) and Stephen V Woodhouse (1878) was played at WS/O/813 in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (C07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Frans van Putten games or Stephen V Woodhouse games? This Frans van Putten vs Stephen V Woodhouse encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Frans van Putten vs Stephen V Woodhouse?
Frans van Putten vs Stephen V Woodhouse (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Frans van Putten.
What opening was played in Frans van Putten vs Stephen V Woodhouse?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (ECO C07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Frans van Putten vs Stephen V Woodhouse, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.