Sardul Purewal vs John W Chidley-Hill
CAN-op (Pinnacle 48. CAN Op Ch), 2011 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sardul Purewal vs John W Chidley-Hill with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sardul Purewal (2056)
- Black
- John W Chidley-Hill (1787)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- CAN-op (Pinnacle 48. CAN Op Ch)
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sardul Purewal (2056) and John W Chidley-Hill (1787) was played at CAN-op (Pinnacle 48. CAN Op Ch) in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sardul Purewal games or John W Chidley-Hill games? This Sardul Purewal vs John W Chidley-Hill encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sardul Purewal vs John W Chidley-Hill?
Sardul Purewal vs John W Chidley-Hill (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Sardul Purewal vs John W Chidley-Hill?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (ECO E14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sardul Purewal vs John W Chidley-Hill, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.