Alan K Punnett vs Keith R Ingram
4NCL Division 2d, 2017 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B49).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alan K Punnett vs Keith R Ingram with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alan K Punnett (2038)
- Black
- Keith R Ingram (1970)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 4NCL Division 2d
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B49)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alan K Punnett (2038) and Keith R Ingram (1970) was played at 4NCL Division 2d in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B49). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alan K Punnett games or Keith R Ingram games? This Alan K Punnett vs Keith R Ingram encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alan K Punnett vs Keith R Ingram?
Alan K Punnett vs Keith R Ingram (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Alan K Punnett vs Keith R Ingram?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (ECO B49).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alan K Punnett vs Keith R Ingram, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.