Yosmani Pulido Ledesma vs Johans Ariel Caceres Machuat
2010 · Result ½–½ · Semi-Slav Defense Accepted (D44).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Yosmani Pulido Ledesma vs Johans Ariel Caceres Machuat with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Yosmani Pulido Ledesma (1933)
- Black
- Johans Ariel Caceres Machuat (1827)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Semi-Slav Defense Accepted (D44)
About this chess game
This chess game between Yosmani Pulido Ledesma (1933) and Johans Ariel Caceres Machuat (1827) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Semi-Slav Defense Accepted (D44). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Yosmani Pulido Ledesma games or Johans Ariel Caceres Machuat games? This Yosmani Pulido Ledesma vs Johans Ariel Caceres Machuat encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Semi-Slav Defense Accepted.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Yosmani Pulido Ledesma vs Johans Ariel Caceres Machuat?
Yosmani Pulido Ledesma vs Johans Ariel Caceres Machuat (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Yosmani Pulido Ledesma vs Johans Ariel Caceres Machuat?
The game opened with the Semi-Slav Defense Accepted (ECO D44).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Yosmani Pulido Ledesma vs Johans Ariel Caceres Machuat, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.