Francisco Daniel Pulido Esteban vs Alejandra Marquez Marvizon
2015 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense (D10).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Francisco Daniel Pulido Esteban vs Alejandra Marquez Marvizon with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Francisco Daniel Pulido Esteban (1692)
- Black
- Alejandra Marquez Marvizon (1968)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Slav Defense (D10)
About this chess game
This chess game between Francisco Daniel Pulido Esteban (1692) and Alejandra Marquez Marvizon (1968) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense (D10). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Francisco Daniel Pulido Esteban games or Alejandra Marquez Marvizon games? This Francisco Daniel Pulido Esteban vs Alejandra Marquez Marvizon encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Francisco Daniel Pulido Esteban vs Alejandra Marquez Marvizon?
Francisco Daniel Pulido Esteban vs Alejandra Marquez Marvizon (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Francisco Daniel Pulido Esteban vs Alejandra Marquez Marvizon?
The game opened with the Slav Defense (ECO D10).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Francisco Daniel Pulido Esteban vs Alejandra Marquez Marvizon, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.