Antoni Puigdueta Xalabarder vs Josep Sola Montoya
2016 · Result 1–0 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Antoni Puigdueta Xalabarder vs Josep Sola Montoya with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Antoni Puigdueta Xalabarder (1499)
- Black
- Josep Sola Montoya (1571)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55)
About this chess game
This chess game between Antoni Puigdueta Xalabarder (1499) and Josep Sola Montoya (1571) was played in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Antoni Puigdueta Xalabarder games or Josep Sola Montoya games? This Antoni Puigdueta Xalabarder vs Josep Sola Montoya encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Antoni Puigdueta Xalabarder vs Josep Sola Montoya?
Antoni Puigdueta Xalabarder vs Josep Sola Montoya (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Antoni Puigdueta Xalabarder.
What opening was played in Antoni Puigdueta Xalabarder vs Josep Sola Montoya?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (ECO C55).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Antoni Puigdueta Xalabarder vs Josep Sola Montoya, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.