Josep Puig Carres vs Joel Solani Nunez
2012 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Josep Puig Carres vs Joel Solani Nunez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Josep Puig Carres (1815)
- Black
- Joel Solani Nunez (1718)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Josep Puig Carres (1815) and Joel Solani Nunez (1718) was played in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Josep Puig Carres games or Joel Solani Nunez games? This Josep Puig Carres vs Joel Solani Nunez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Josep Puig Carres vs Joel Solani Nunez?
Josep Puig Carres vs Joel Solani Nunez (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Joel Solani Nunez.
What opening was played in Josep Puig Carres vs Joel Solani Nunez?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (ECO A38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Josep Puig Carres vs Joel Solani Nunez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.