Kateryna Protsko vs Alexander Turutin
2009 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation (E68).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Kateryna Protsko vs Alexander Turutin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Kateryna Protsko (1830)
- Black
- Alexander Turutin (2381)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation (E68)
About this chess game
This chess game between Kateryna Protsko (1830) and Alexander Turutin (2381) was played in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation (E68). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Kateryna Protsko games or Alexander Turutin games? This Kateryna Protsko vs Alexander Turutin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Kateryna Protsko vs Alexander Turutin?
Kateryna Protsko vs Alexander Turutin (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Alexander Turutin.
What opening was played in Kateryna Protsko vs Alexander Turutin?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation (ECO E68).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Kateryna Protsko vs Alexander Turutin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.