Peter Prohaszka vs Benjamin Bok
It (cat.10), 2013 · Result ½–½ · Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Peter Prohaszka vs Benjamin Bok with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Peter Prohaszka (2070)
- Black
- Benjamin Bok (2532)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- It (cat.10)
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93)
About this chess game
This chess game between Peter Prohaszka (2070) and Benjamin Bok (2532) was played at It (cat.10) in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Peter Prohaszka games or Benjamin Bok games? This Peter Prohaszka vs Benjamin Bok encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Peter Prohaszka vs Benjamin Bok?
Peter Prohaszka vs Benjamin Bok (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Peter Prohaszka vs Benjamin Bok?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (ECO D93).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Peter Prohaszka vs Benjamin Bok, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.