Paul J. M. Prieckaerts vs Rommel Tamayo Gutiérrez
CADAP-NED 2017, 2017 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Indian Defense (E12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Paul J. M. Prieckaerts vs Rommel Tamayo Gutiérrez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Paul J. M. Prieckaerts (1983)
- Black
- Rommel Tamayo Gutiérrez (2083)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- CADAP-NED 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense (E12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Paul J. M. Prieckaerts (1983) and Rommel Tamayo Gutiérrez (2083) was played at CADAP-NED 2017 in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense (E12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Paul J. M. Prieckaerts games or Rommel Tamayo Gutiérrez games? This Paul J. M. Prieckaerts vs Rommel Tamayo Gutiérrez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Paul J. M. Prieckaerts vs Rommel Tamayo Gutiérrez?
Paul J. M. Prieckaerts vs Rommel Tamayo Gutiérrez (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Rommel Tamayo Gutiérrez.
What opening was played in Paul J. M. Prieckaerts vs Rommel Tamayo Gutiérrez?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense (ECO E12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Paul J. M. Prieckaerts vs Rommel Tamayo Gutiérrez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.