Prasad P. Praveen vs Govind Ballabh Joshi
Bhiwani IND, 48. Challengers Ch, 2010 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Prasad P. Praveen vs Govind Ballabh Joshi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Prasad P. Praveen (2256)
- Black
- Govind Ballabh Joshi (2288)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Bhiwani IND, 48. Challengers Ch
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30)
About this chess game
This chess game between Prasad P. Praveen (2256) and Govind Ballabh Joshi (2288) was played at Bhiwani IND, 48. Challengers Ch in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Prasad P. Praveen games or Govind Ballabh Joshi games? This Prasad P. Praveen vs Govind Ballabh Joshi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Prasad P. Praveen vs Govind Ballabh Joshi?
Prasad P. Praveen vs Govind Ballabh Joshi (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Prasad P. Praveen vs Govind Ballabh Joshi?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (ECO B30).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Prasad P. Praveen vs Govind Ballabh Joshi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.