Gerrit Prakken vs Gregor Taube
Arctic Chess Challenge, 2009 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (A39).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gerrit Prakken vs Gregor Taube with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gerrit Prakken (2156)
- Black
- Gregor Taube (1903)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Arctic Chess Challenge
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (A39)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gerrit Prakken (2156) and Gregor Taube (1903) was played at Arctic Chess Challenge in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (A39). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gerrit Prakken games or Gregor Taube games? This Gerrit Prakken vs Gregor Taube encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gerrit Prakken vs Gregor Taube?
Gerrit Prakken vs Gregor Taube (2009) finished 1–0, a win for Gerrit Prakken.
What opening was played in Gerrit Prakken vs Gregor Taube?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (ECO A39).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gerrit Prakken vs Gregor Taube, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.