Stanislaw Praczukowski vs Bartlomiej Rozycki
2016 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation (E43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Stanislaw Praczukowski vs Bartlomiej Rozycki with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Stanislaw Praczukowski (2033)
- Black
- Bartlomiej Rozycki (2165)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation (E43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Stanislaw Praczukowski (2033) and Bartlomiej Rozycki (2165) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation (E43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Stanislaw Praczukowski games or Bartlomiej Rozycki games? This Stanislaw Praczukowski vs Bartlomiej Rozycki encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Stanislaw Praczukowski vs Bartlomiej Rozycki?
Stanislaw Praczukowski vs Bartlomiej Rozycki (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Stanislaw Praczukowski vs Bartlomiej Rozycki?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation (ECO E43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Stanislaw Praczukowski vs Bartlomiej Rozycki, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.