Elena Pozo Vinuesa vs Alberto Quintero Perdomo
2012 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Elena Pozo Vinuesa vs Alberto Quintero Perdomo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Elena Pozo Vinuesa (1533)
- Black
- Alberto Quintero Perdomo (1698)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Elena Pozo Vinuesa (1533) and Alberto Quintero Perdomo (1698) was played in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Elena Pozo Vinuesa games or Alberto Quintero Perdomo games? This Elena Pozo Vinuesa vs Alberto Quintero Perdomo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Elena Pozo Vinuesa vs Alberto Quintero Perdomo?
Elena Pozo Vinuesa vs Alberto Quintero Perdomo (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Elena Pozo Vinuesa.
What opening was played in Elena Pozo Vinuesa vs Alberto Quintero Perdomo?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (ECO B92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Elena Pozo Vinuesa vs Alberto Quintero Perdomo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.