Christopher Potter vs Ludger Heiermann
WS/O/423, 2011 · Result 0–1 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Open Variation (C56).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Christopher Potter vs Ludger Heiermann with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Christopher Potter (1638)
- Black
- Ludger Heiermann (1661)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- WS/O/423
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Open Variation (C56)
About this chess game
This chess game between Christopher Potter (1638) and Ludger Heiermann (1661) was played at WS/O/423 in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Open Variation (C56). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Christopher Potter games or Ludger Heiermann games? This Christopher Potter vs Ludger Heiermann encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Open Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Christopher Potter vs Ludger Heiermann?
Christopher Potter vs Ludger Heiermann (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Ludger Heiermann.
What opening was played in Christopher Potter vs Ludger Heiermann?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Open Variation (ECO C56).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Christopher Potter vs Ludger Heiermann, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.