Janko Potrata vs Robert Klemm
WLS/IO1/SF SF 2 (WLS), 2022 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Poisoned Pawn Variation (B97).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Janko Potrata vs Robert Klemm with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Janko Potrata (2371)
- Black
- Robert Klemm (1793)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- WLS/IO1/SF SF 2 (WLS)
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Poisoned Pawn Variation (B97)
About this chess game
This chess game between Janko Potrata (2371) and Robert Klemm (1793) was played at WLS/IO1/SF SF 2 (WLS) in 2022 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Poisoned Pawn Variation (B97). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Janko Potrata games or Robert Klemm games? This Janko Potrata vs Robert Klemm encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Poisoned Pawn Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Janko Potrata vs Robert Klemm?
Janko Potrata vs Robert Klemm (2022) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Janko Potrata vs Robert Klemm?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Poisoned Pawn Variation (ECO B97).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Janko Potrata vs Robert Klemm, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.