Diego Portero Rodriguez vs Jose Luis Evora Brondo
2017 · Result 0–1 · Ruy Lopez: Closed, Yates Variation (C91).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Diego Portero Rodriguez vs Jose Luis Evora Brondo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Diego Portero Rodriguez (1341)
- Black
- Jose Luis Evora Brondo (1951)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Closed, Yates Variation (C91)
About this chess game
This chess game between Diego Portero Rodriguez (1341) and Jose Luis Evora Brondo (1951) was played in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Yates Variation (C91). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Diego Portero Rodriguez games or Jose Luis Evora Brondo games? This Diego Portero Rodriguez vs Jose Luis Evora Brondo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Yates Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Diego Portero Rodriguez vs Jose Luis Evora Brondo?
Diego Portero Rodriguez vs Jose Luis Evora Brondo (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Jose Luis Evora Brondo.
What opening was played in Diego Portero Rodriguez vs Jose Luis Evora Brondo?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Yates Variation (ECO C91).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Diego Portero Rodriguez vs Jose Luis Evora Brondo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.