Polina Aleksandrovn Popova vs Volodymyr Galytskyi
CT20/pr22, 2013 · Result 0–1 · Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (C48).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Polina Aleksandrovn Popova vs Volodymyr Galytskyi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- Black
- Volodymyr Galytskyi (2378)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- CT20/pr22
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (C48)
About this chess game
This chess game between Polina Aleksandrovn Popova and Volodymyr Galytskyi (2378) was played at CT20/pr22 in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (C48). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Polina Aleksandrovn Popova games or Volodymyr Galytskyi games? This Polina Aleksandrovn Popova vs Volodymyr Galytskyi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Polina Aleksandrovn Popova vs Volodymyr Galytskyi?
Polina Aleksandrovn Popova vs Volodymyr Galytskyi (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Volodymyr Galytskyi.
What opening was played in Polina Aleksandrovn Popova vs Volodymyr Galytskyi?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (ECO C48).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Polina Aleksandrovn Popova vs Volodymyr Galytskyi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.