Erik Pontoppidan vs Geoffrey Lloyd
VWC11 /pr 15, 2018 · Result 0–1 · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Erik Pontoppidan vs Geoffrey Lloyd with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Erik Pontoppidan (1712)
- Black
- Geoffrey Lloyd (2242)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- VWC11 /pr 15
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87)
About this chess game
This chess game between Erik Pontoppidan (1712) and Geoffrey Lloyd (2242) was played at VWC11 /pr 15 in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Erik Pontoppidan games or Geoffrey Lloyd games? This Erik Pontoppidan vs Geoffrey Lloyd encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Erik Pontoppidan vs Geoffrey Lloyd?
Erik Pontoppidan vs Geoffrey Lloyd (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Geoffrey Lloyd.
What opening was played in Erik Pontoppidan vs Geoffrey Lloyd?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (ECO D87).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Erik Pontoppidan vs Geoffrey Lloyd, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.